gnupic: Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC


Previous by date: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Jeff
Next by date: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Help needed, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Jeff
Next in thread: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Colm O' Flaherty

Subject: Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC
From: "George M. Gallant, Jr." ####@####.####
Date: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000
Message-Id: <1142439569.12532.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Having both flavors I vote for 16bit only. Also would consider using the
newer chips with
the extended instruction set.

George
 
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 16:08 +0000, Colm O' Flaherty wrote:

> There are still a lot of 14 bit PICs out there though (I still only use 14 
> bit PICs).. and if we make mistakes with the GCC implementation, I'd rather 
> make them with the 14 bit port, than with the 16 bit port..
> 
> Once the 14 bit port is running, a 16 bit port should be a reasonably easy 
> migration.  On the other hand, if we start with the 16 bit port, we'll never 
> develop a 14 bit port.. :)
> 
> I'd like to see what everyone else thinks though.. Are people migrating off 
> 14 bit PICs, or are they still being used?
> 
> As for Java.. I agree, don't think it would be too useful on the 14 bit, but 
> maybe on the higher-end 16 bit chips, it might be useful.. (it's an 
> interesting academic exercise to compile Java for PIC, if nothing else  :)  
> )  It comes for free anyway if we develop the PIC backend, so wheres the 
> disadvantage?  Having C/C++ for PIC out of the box on Linux (via GCC) is a 
> bit of a dream.. I'm surprised it hasn't been done already..
> 
> Colm
> 
> >From: "Xiaofan Chen" ####@####.####
> >Reply-To: ####@####.####
> >To: ####@####.####
> >Subject: Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC
> >Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:46:32 +0800
> >
> >GCC port for 14 bit PICsHInteresting. Maybe it is better to start with 
> >16-bit
> >PICs (18F). I think PIC18F are now getting more and more popular.
> >
> >We can still use assembly for 14-bit PICs even though something like
> >HiTech PICC is really good to have (but it is not free and rather 
> >expensive).
> >
> >Do we need Java for PIC? ;-)
> >
> >Regards,
> >Xiaofan
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> >For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 

Previous by date: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Jeff
Next by date: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Help needed, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Jeff
Next in thread: 15 Mar 2006 16:21:50 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Colm O' Flaherty


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.