gnupic: Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC


Previous by date: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Martin Klingensmith
Previous in thread: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Martin Klingensmith

Subject: Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC
From: Wayne Topa ####@####.####
Date: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000
Message-Id: <20060315200736.GA18670@intergate.com>

Colm O' ####@####.#### is reported to have said:
> There are still a lot of 14 bit PICs out there though (I still only use 14 
> bit PICs).. and if we make mistakes with the GCC implementation, I'd rather 
> make them with the 14 bit port, than with the 16 bit port..
> 
> Once the 14 bit port is running, a 16 bit port should be a reasonably easy 
> migration.  On the other hand, if we start with the 16 bit port, we'll 
> never develop a 14 bit port.. :)
> 
> I'd like to see what everyone else thinks though.. Are people migrating off 
> 14 bit PICs, or are they still being used?
> 
Still using 14 bit  until all my projects are done.

Wayne
-- 
Real Users find the one combination of bizarre input values that shuts
down the system for days.
_______________________________________________________

Previous by date: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Martin Klingensmith
Previous in thread: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 15 Mar 2006 20:57:27 +0000 Re: [gnupic] GCC port of PIC, Martin Klingensmith


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.