gnupic: Re: [gnupic] ready to start
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] ready to start
From:
"Maxim Wexler" ####@####.####
Date:
28 Mar 2006 05:59:25 +0100
Message-Id: <a0811460603272058i2604d827r7536f754b7348829@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/27/06, Jan Wagemakers ####@####.#### wrote:
>
> Maxim Wexler ####@####.#### schreef:
>
> >>> What's the best program(s) to use. Will a home built programmer suit
> or
> >>> should I order one ready made.
> >> I make use of a home built programmer and picprog. You can find more
> >> info at <http://hyvatti.iki.fi/~jaakko/pic/picprog.html>. picprog is a
> >> commandline tool, so X is not needed.
> > 16LF87-I isn't included in $picprog --help. Has this been updated?
>
> PIC16F87 is included. I have not tried the PIC16LF87 myself, but have
> succesfully programmed a PIC18LF452 and a PIC18LF4520. So, it seems to
> me that the programming algorithm between the F and LF parts are the
> same.
>
> Please correct me when I'm wrong ;-)
>
> > Also the schematic at hyvatti.iki.fi/~jaako/pic/picprog.html and at
> > jdm.homepage.newpics.html which are linked from a common page are
> slightly
> > different. Which is the one I want? Or, which is preferable?
>
> No idea. I have build my programmer in 2003 and used the schematic at
> picprog.html. But according to picprog.html the schematic at
> <http://www.jdm.homepage.dk/newpic.htm> is a better choice.
But the photo of the device and the schematic aren't the same. For instance,
the photo has only one electrolytic and has what looks like an 8 pin
connector
