gnupic: Re: [gnupic] Dodgy addresses in LST xref of COD files


Previous by date: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Dodgy addresses in LST xref of COD files, Robert Pearce
Next by date: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100 Configuration Bits, Luciano de Barros
Previous in thread: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Dodgy addresses in LST xref of COD files, Robert Pearce
Next in thread: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Dodgy addresses in LST xref of COD files, Scott Dattalo

Subject: Re: [gnupic] Dodgy addresses in LST xref of COD files
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100
Message-Id: <444FA5DC.1090402@dattalo.com>

Robert Pearce wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Robert Pearce ####@####.#### wrote :
> 
>>
>> What I find is that for _some_ of these cases, when linked, the 
>> generated COD file declares some lines wrongly in the list file 
>> cross-reference.
> 
> 
> OK, I fetched the source and had a grub around. Here is a patch that 
> fixes this. I've checked it produces identical .hex .map and .lst files, 
> and the only .cod difference is that the addresses are now right.

Hi Robert,

I'm not sure if Craig has seen this message or not. But if we don't hear 
from him by this weekend, then I'll commit your patch to gputils.

Scott

Previous by date: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Dodgy addresses in LST xref of COD files, Robert Pearce
Next by date: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100 Configuration Bits, Luciano de Barros
Previous in thread: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Dodgy addresses in LST xref of COD files, Robert Pearce
Next in thread: 26 Apr 2006 17:54:58 +0100 Re: [gnupic] Dodgy addresses in LST xref of COD files, Scott Dattalo


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.