gnupic: Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement


Previous by date: 15 Jul 2006 18:40:42 +0100 16f84 replacement, Maxim Wexler
Next by date: 15 Jul 2006 18:40:42 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, Eamon Skelton
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2006 18:40:42 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, Eamon Skelton

Subject: RE: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement
From: "octal works" ####@####.####
Date: 15 Jul 2006 18:40:42 +0100
Message-Id: <20060715174034.2195175B8C@smtp2-g19.free.fr>

May be the best alternative to 16F84 is 16F628(a). You can also use the
16F88 (but it does not program under some old programmers). 
Best regards

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Maxim Wexler ####@####.#### 
Envoyé : samedi 15 juillet 2006 17:08
À : ####@####.####
Objet : [gnupic] 16f84 replacement

Hi group,

The picprog docs use the example of a 16f84 but I hear that's an obsolete
chip and picprog --help doesn't even list it.

So what' s a good alternative for a newbie to use?

FWIW, using the Olimex PG2C.

BTW, for a canuck, what's the best source for PICs?

-MW


Previous by date: 15 Jul 2006 18:40:42 +0100 16f84 replacement, Maxim Wexler
Next by date: 15 Jul 2006 18:40:42 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, Eamon Skelton
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2006 18:40:42 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, Eamon Skelton


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.