gnupic: Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement


Previous by date: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, octal works
Next by date: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, Robert Pearce
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, octal works
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, Robert Pearce

Subject: Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement
From: Eamon Skelton ####@####.####
Date: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100
Message-Id: <44B93DD6.5070707@oceanfree.net>

Maxim Wexler wrote:
> Hi group,
> 
> The picprog docs use the example of a 16f84 but I hear that's an obsolete
> chip and picprog --help doesn't even list it.
> 
> So what' s a good alternative for a newbie to use?
> 
> FWIW, using the Olimex PG2C.
> 
> BTW, for a canuck, what's the best source for PICs?
> 
> -MW

The PIC16F628 or PIC16F627 is a good replacement for the 84. There
are others but I use the 628 because our local shop keeps a good
stock of them.

E.S.


-- 
Linux 2.6.17

Previous by date: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, octal works
Next by date: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, Robert Pearce
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, octal works
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2006 19:11:18 +0100 Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement, Robert Pearce


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.