gnupic: Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] 16f84 replacement
From:
Robert Pearce ####@####.####
Date:
15 Jul 2006 22:30:47 +0100
Message-Id: <JS03ucB$YUuEFwbB@jonah.huneausware.local>
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Maxim Wexler ####@####.#### wrote :
>The picprog docs use the example of a 16f84 but I hear that's an obsolete
>chip and picprog --help doesn't even list it.
>
>So what' s a good alternative for a newbie to use?
>
The 16F84 used to be the defacto standard basic entry-level PIC, because
it was the cheapest 18-pin 14-bit flash version with EEPROM. The 16F627
(or 628) now seems to have taken that place, largely because despite
having extra peripherals it has been cheaper than the '84 for some time.
--
Rob Pearce http://www.bdt-home.demon.co.uk
The contents of this | Yes, but which self do you want to be?
message are purely |
my opinion. Don't |
believe a word. |
