gnupic: Re: [gnupic] [ANN] Pikme PIC Bootloader (for 16F819 etc)


Previous by date: 28 Jul 2006 19:35:50 +0100 Re: [gnupic] problems with pikdev tarball and deb pkg, Maxim Wexler
Next by date: 28 Jul 2006 19:35:50 +0100 Re: [sdcc-devel] Release schedule, Borut Razem
Previous in thread: 28 Jul 2006 19:35:50 +0100 Re: [gnupic] [ANN] Pikme PIC Bootloader (for 16F819 etc), Byron A Jeff
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [gnupic] [ANN] Pikme PIC Bootloader (for 16F819 etc)
From: Rob Pearce ####@####.####
Date: 28 Jul 2006 19:35:50 +0100
Message-Id: <200607280908.11608.rob@bdt-home.demon.co.uk>

On Thursday 27 July 2006 02:35, Byron A Jeff wrote:
> To recap the advantages of bit banged interfaces:
>
> 1) Use the I/O pin of choice.
> 2) Can develop single pin half duplex interfaces.
> 3) Adds an additional debugging channel.
> 4) Doesn't require bootloading through an application specific interface.
> 5) Bootloader and application can run at the same time on the PC.
> 6) Works with chips that don't have a USART. Frank did the 16F819 bit
> banged because he didn't have a choice.

Frankly, if using the USART for the bootloader is THAT MUCH of a pain for you, 
then don't bother with a bootloader. ICSP is much easier.

Previous by date: 28 Jul 2006 19:35:50 +0100 Re: [gnupic] problems with pikdev tarball and deb pkg, Maxim Wexler
Next by date: 28 Jul 2006 19:35:50 +0100 Re: [sdcc-devel] Release schedule, Borut Razem
Previous in thread: 28 Jul 2006 19:35:50 +0100 Re: [gnupic] [ANN] Pikme PIC Bootloader (for 16F819 etc), Byron A Jeff
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.