gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gpsim-0.22.0-RC3 regression test fizzles
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] gpsim-0.22.0-RC3 regression test fizzles
From:
"David Barnett" ####@####.####
Date:
6 Nov 2006 21:31:24 +0000
Message-Id: <055501c701eb$15578cb0$0401a8c0@barnett2>
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Barnett" ####@####.####
To: ####@####.####
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: [gnupic] gpsim-0.22.0-RC3 regression test fizzles
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maxim Wexler" ####@####.####
> To: ####@####.####
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [gnupic] gpsim-0.22.0-RC3 regression test fizzles
>
>
>>> There are currently 41 regression tests and this is one of the first. So
>>> perhaps this test result scrolled off the screen before you noticed it.
>>> The failure is due to the very first read of the p12 internal I2C eeprom
>>> returning the wrong status. However, the second and all subsequent reads
>>> return the proper status.
>>
>>
>> Well, there's 41 here. From prompt to prompt. Is '*** PASSED 12CE518
>> internal EEPROM test' what yours is supposed to say? Do you mean running
>> regression twice fixes it?
> No, each time you run this regression test, it performs several
> reads/writes. The first of those will fail every time.
>
>> ...
>> *** PASSED 12CE518 internal EEPROM test
>> ...
> For me, this line is:
> !!! FAILED p12ce518/make sim
>
> However, prior to r1783 in gpsim's SVN repository, the test had a bug and
> didn't notice the failure. From the different wording, I think you've got
> an old snapshot.
Actually, the wording doesn't tell anything. After looking at the script, I
think the PASS and FAIL messages are just significantly different. Where
did your source snapshot come from?
David
