gnupic: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88


Previous by date: 18 Dec 2006 23:14:36 +0000 real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler
Next by date: 18 Dec 2006 23:14:36 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 18 Dec 2006 23:14:36 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Scott Dattalo

Subject: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 18 Dec 2006 23:14:36 +0000
Message-Id: <458720BB.6050404@dattalo.com>

Maxim Wexler wrote:

> However in gpsim only RA0 to RA5 become active outputs. Why not RA6 and 
> RA7?
> Furthermore, RA5, according to the PDF, can never be an output and doubles
> as MCLR.

I took a look at this and you're correct. gpsim has two bugs here! I'll
fix these shortly. (If it is going to take a while, then I'll let you
know. I'm currently in the middle of developing an I2C host controller
module. This has turned out to be more difficult than I had expected.)


> Also another questions arises: How do I activate it safely if the code
> expects to see an output where I plan to insert a reset button to start the
> thing?

Probably the best alternative (at the moment) is to type 'Reset' at the
command line. This will reset the chip.

Scott

Previous by date: 18 Dec 2006 23:14:36 +0000 real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler
Next by date: 18 Dec 2006 23:14:36 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 18 Dec 2006 23:14:36 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Scott Dattalo


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.