gnupic: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88


Previous by date: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Xiaofan Chen
Previous in thread: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Xiaofan Chen

Subject: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88
From: "Maxim Wexler" ####@####.####
Date: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000
Message-Id: <a0811460612190837j5f565002o429d4cecabaa865b@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Scott,

Meanwhile I adapted the file to use PORTB and it worked fine in gpsim but
not in hardware. When I ran pkp -v(erify) got this:

memory+EEPROM+ID+fuses+error.

Have any idea what this is about? Google came up empty.

Maxim

Previous by date: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Xiaofan Chen
Previous in thread: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 19 Dec 2006 16:37:24 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Xiaofan Chen


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.