| Previous by date: | 20 Dec 2006 12:15:22 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Next by date: | 20 Dec 2006 12:15:22 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Previous in thread: | 20 Dec 2006 12:15:22 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Next in thread: | 20 Dec 2006 12:15:22 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
On 12/20/06, Maxim Wexler ####@####.#### wrote: > Thanks Scott, > > Meanwhile I adapted the file to use PORTB and it worked fine in gpsim but > not in hardware. When I ran pkp -v(erify) got this: > > memory+EEPROM+ID+fuses+error. > > Have any idea what this is about? Google came up empty. The last thing you want to do when starting with PIC is to debug your programmer. I believe PICkit 2 is a much better choice than TLVP even though some people would really like to make their own programmer. PICkit 2 is well supported by pk2/pyk/piklab under Linux. Device support of PICkit 2 under Windows: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1406&dDocName=en027813 Next version of pk2-3.xx will support many more PICs under Linux by supporting the version 2.xx firmware of PICKit 2. By the way, PICkit 2 is now on sale. You can get the bare programmer for US$28 and the bundle (with 44pin 16F917 board or 20pin 16F690 board) for US$40. http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=2519¶m=en028609&redirects=express Regards, Xiaofan
| Previous by date: | 20 Dec 2006 12:15:22 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Next by date: | 20 Dec 2006 12:15:22 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Previous in thread: | 20 Dec 2006 12:15:22 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Next in thread: | 20 Dec 2006 12:15:22 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |