| Previous by date: | 20 Dec 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Next by date: | 20 Dec 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Previous in thread: | 20 Dec 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Next in thread: | 20 Dec 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
On Wed December 20 2006 08:40, Maxim Wexler wrote: > > Googling around I came across pickit-devel. In a post from last March you > said the 16f88 wasn't yest supported. Is that still true? Pickit2 supports the 16F88. >The pic of the pickit board doesn't look like it can > take a 18 PDIP. > The Low Pin Count Demo board doesn't--you need the 18-Pin Demo Board. Jeff
| Previous by date: | 20 Dec 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Next by date: | 20 Dec 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Previous in thread: | 20 Dec 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |
| Next in thread: | 20 Dec 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler |