gnupic: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88


Previous by date: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler
Next by date: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Mark Rages
Previous in thread: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler
Next in thread: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Mark Rages

Subject: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88
From: Jeff ####@####.####
Date: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000
Message-Id: <200612221924.18799.j_post@pacbell.net>

On Fri December 22 2006 18:02, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> > The Low Pin Count Demo board doesn't--you need the 18-Pin Demo Board.
>
> I've looked all over for a Pickit2 w/18 pin header and can't find it. Is it
> difficult to adapt something? Is it worthwhile?
>
It's not just worthwhile, it's necessary if you're going to program 18 pin 
devices.

After taking a closer look at the boards, I see that the LPC demo board is 
part number 04-01831 and the 18-pin demo board is part number 04-0xxxx, so 
I'm not sure if this has been officially released by Microchip. Dan, can you 
help him out as to how to obtain one?

Jeff


Previous by date: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler
Next by date: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Mark Rages
Previous in thread: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler
Next in thread: 23 Dec 2006 03:22:14 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Mark Rages


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.