gnupic: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88


Previous by date: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Jeff
Next by date: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Xiaofan Chen
Previous in thread: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Jeff
Next in thread: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Xiaofan Chen

Subject: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88
From: "Mark Rages" ####@####.####
Date: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000
Message-Id: <74ee72ca0612222011k1d534b53w628890e68a5e2ff@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/22/06, Jeff ####@####.#### wrote:
> On Fri December 22 2006 18:02, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> > > The Low Pin Count Demo board doesn't--you need the 18-Pin Demo Board.
> >
> > I've looked all over for a Pickit2 w/18 pin header and can't find it. Is it
> > difficult to adapt something? Is it worthwhile?
> >
> It's not just worthwhile, it's necessary if you're going to program 18 pin
> devices.
>

It's not hard to build your own programming adapter from a socket and
single-row header and five wires.

Better yet, design the application to use ICSP.

Regards,
Mark
markrages@gmail
-- 
You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one.
  - fortune cookie

Previous by date: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Jeff
Next by date: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Xiaofan Chen
Previous in thread: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Jeff
Next in thread: 23 Dec 2006 04:12:15 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Xiaofan Chen


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.