gnupic: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88


Previous by date: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Mark Rages
Next by date: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler
Previous in thread: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Mark Rages
Next in thread: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler

Subject: Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88
From: "Xiaofan Chen" ####@####.####
Date: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000
Message-Id: <a276da400612230329r17b91c17i4e872e84d4cc94e0@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/23/06, Maxim Wexler ####@####.#### wrote:
> > >
> > The Low Pin Count Demo board doesn't--you need the 18-Pin Demo Board.
>
> I've looked all over for a Pickit2 w/18 pin header and can't find it. Is it
> difficult to adapt something? Is it worthwhile?

http://forum.microchip.com/tm.aspx?m=211926
AC162049 with a simple modification will make an idea adapter for
DIP packages PICs.

Previous by date: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Mark Rages
Next by date: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler
Previous in thread: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Mark Rages
Next in thread: 23 Dec 2006 11:29:29 +0000 Re: [gnupic] real vs simulated for 16f88, Maxim Wexler


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.