gnupic: Re: [gnupic] COD file format


Previous by date: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000 Re: [gnupic] COD file format, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000 Linker Optimizations, David Barnett
Previous in thread: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000 Re: [gnupic] COD file format, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000 Re: [gnupic] COD file format, Scott Dattalo

Subject: Re: [gnupic] COD file format
From: "David Barnett" ####@####.####
Date: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000
Message-Id: <0ac901c75cf8$74a3dfd0$2001a8c0@barnett2>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Dattalo" ####@####.####
To: ####@####.####
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [gnupic] COD file format


> David Barnett wrote:
>> Apparently the COD file format is proprietary ByteCraft information, but 
>> gputils uses the COD format.  Did we request information from ByteCraft, 
>> reverse engineer the format, or something else?  I can't see how 
>> ByteCraft would release proprietary information to us since the source 
>> code would be pretty revealing.
>>
>> David
>>
> Hi David,
>
> Several years ago when I added COD format support to gpasm, I sought and 
> obtained permission from Walter Banks to use ByteCraft's proprietary COD 
> format.
>
> Scott
>
Interesting.  Did they provide any information or did you discover that 
yourself?  Did they restrict how you could use/share that information?  It 
seems like giving permission to use a proprietary format in GPL'd software 
is effectively open-sourcing it.  I don't understand how it can still be 
proprietary.

David 


Previous by date: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000 Re: [gnupic] COD file format, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000 Linker Optimizations, David Barnett
Previous in thread: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000 Re: [gnupic] COD file format, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 2 Mar 2007 18:30:08 +0000 Re: [gnupic] COD file format, Scott Dattalo


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.