gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32


Previous by date: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32, David Barnett
Next by date: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32, Tamas Rudnai
Previous in thread: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32, David Barnett
Next in thread: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32, Tamas Rudnai

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32
From: "Scott Dattalo" ####@####.####
Date: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100
Message-Id: <63992.71.139.7.38.1178114618.squirrel@ruckus.brouhaha.com>

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 08:53 -0500, David Barnett wrote:

> gpsim has trouble with output files produced by MPASM (except maybe much
> older versions of MPASM).  You will notice that if you type 'proc list',
> pic10f202 is listed, but it's saying p10F202 is not a valid processor.
> One
> of the differences with the newer MPASM is the upper/lower-case of the
> proc
> name.  gpsim supports "pic10f202", "PIC10F202", "p10f202", and "P10F202"
> (IIRC), but *not* "p10F202" (notice the mixed case).

Since I don't use MPASM, I was unaware of this issue. In my opinion, gpsim
should support MPASM generate files...

BTW, I have also added support for the 10f204 and 10f206, but have not
checked this code in yet.

Scott

Previous by date: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32, David Barnett
Next by date: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32, Tamas Rudnai
Previous in thread: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32, David Barnett
Next in thread: 2 May 2007 15:04:08 +0100 Re: [gnupic] gpsimWin32, Tamas Rudnai


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.