gnupic: Re: [gnupic] PIC 16F690
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] PIC 16F690
From:
####@####.####
Date:
23 May 2007 10:54:56 +0100
Message-Id: <57646.193.65.64.21.1179914001.squirrel@mail.wipsl.com>
Hi,
That user propably would be me. Still actively studying the F690 and
F4550. Development toolchain is mainly piklab & gputils for me. If I
have faced really weird behaviour which I haven't been able to solve by
reading the code, I have been using Windows MPLAB debuging, which I do
not prefer at all.
I also would like to re-enable my vote for F690.
-Mika
> Hi,
> A couple years back, there was an exchange between Scott Dattalo and a
> user
> asking about support for the PIC 16F690. Scott answered that there was as
> yet no support, but that he could whip up PWM-less 16F690 support in not
> much time. The user responded enthusiastically, and that was the end of
> the
> thread.
>
> I'd like to add my voice to that user's, and say that even limited support
> for the f690 would be really great. A lot of people are probably getting
> used to the f690, since it's what the popular PICkit2 comes with.
> - Ted
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>
