gnupic: Re: [gnupic] Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this processor
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this
processor
From:
"Nestor A. Marchesini" ####@####.####
Date:
7 Nov 2007 04:30:35 +0000
Message-Id: <473140CE.30402@xinet.com.ar>
El 06/11/07 23:48, David escribió:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:06:48 -0500
> David ####@####.#### wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:28:54 -0300
>> "Nestor A. Marchesini" ####@####.#### wrote:
>>
>>> Again with the 18f4550, this time trying to define data in memory
>>> eeprom data.
>>> In my opinion gpasm should not generate this warning:
>>>
>>> gpasm-0.13.4 beta prog1.asm 11-6-2007
>>> 21:05:20 PAGE 75
>>> F00000 04012 ORG H'F00000'
>>> Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this processor.
>> ...
>> It seemed like a really tough problem, but I just realized that gplink
>> has been handling this situation just fine for relocatable code
>> ...
> Actually I found out that statement was completely false. If I remember
> correctly, MPLINK doesn't actually emit that warning for relocatable
> code, so neither does gplink. Can anyone confirm that MPASM/MPLINK
> don't emit this warning for relocatable code? It would also be good to
> know whether they give any kind of warning for exceeding the EEPROM
> range in either relocatable or absolute mode.
>
> I guess we'll just have to solve it from scratch...
>
> David Barnett
Assembled with MPASM 5.13 of MPLAB 7.62.
MPASM 5.13 SALIDA.ASM 11-7-2007
1:20:00 PAGE 77
F00000 03998 ORG H'F00000'
F00000 6854 7369 6920 03999 DE "This is a test"
2073 6120 2020
6574 7473
04000 END
No warning in the file listing (absolute mode).
Regards
Néstor A. Marchesini
Chajari-Entre Rios-Argentina
