Previous by date: | 9 Nov 2007 01:27:39 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Re: PIC32 C32 GCC Source Code Released, Xiaofan Chen |
Next by date: | 9 Nov 2007 01:27:39 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this processor, Nestor A. Marchesini |
Previous in thread: | 9 Nov 2007 01:27:39 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this processor, Nestor A. Marchesini |
Next in thread: | 9 Nov 2007 01:27:39 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this processor, Nestor A. Marchesini |
I've finally implemented a solution for this problem (SVN r503). I'm pleased with the solution I found because it will scale well if we later determine that we need 3 or more separate ranges on some device. Thomas Welsch and Nestor, could you update to r503 and make sure it solves your problems? Don't forget to delete any "ERRORLEVEL -220" directives while testing. David Barnett
Previous by date: | 9 Nov 2007 01:27:39 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Re: PIC32 C32 GCC Source Code Released, Xiaofan Chen |
Next by date: | 9 Nov 2007 01:27:39 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this processor, Nestor A. Marchesini |
Previous in thread: | 9 Nov 2007 01:27:39 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this processor, Nestor A. Marchesini |
Next in thread: | 9 Nov 2007 01:27:39 +0000 Re: [gnupic] Warning [220] : Address exceeds maximum range for this processor, Nestor A. Marchesini |