gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN


Previous by date: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN, Borut Razem
Next by date: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN, Borut Razem
Previous in thread: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN, Borut Razem
Next in thread: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN, Borut Razem

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN
From: David ####@####.####
Date: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000
Message-Id: <20071111111623.04bf991f@DEEPTHOUGHT.BARNET.net>

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:53:40 +0100
Peter Stuge ####@####.#### wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:27:13AM -0500, David wrote:
> > BTW, I also applied your patch for cross-compiling from Linux with
> > the mingw script (r505).
> 
> Why is the dash release added? I would prefer to only have the
> version in all distributions from the same source base.
I'm not sure why. I thought at first it was because of the version
blooper mentioned earlier, and I was going to remove it since there
actually wasn't need for another source release, but I noticed the
same situation for 0.13.4: the source tarball was
gputils-0.13.4.tar.gz, but the Windows installer released 5 minutes
later was gputils-0.13.4-1.exe.

Borut, any explanation there? I can rename if necessary.

David Barnett

Previous by date: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN, Borut Razem
Next by date: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN, Borut Razem
Previous in thread: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN, Borut Razem
Next in thread: 11 Nov 2007 16:17:54 +0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils CVS->SVN, Borut Razem


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.