gnupic: Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions


Previous by date: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000 Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions, Ralph Corderoy
Next by date: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000 Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions, David
Previous in thread: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000 Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions, Ralph Corderoy
Next in thread: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000 Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions, David

Subject: Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions
From: David ####@####.####
Date: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000
Message-Id: <20080321133431.1729a391@DEEPTHOUGHT.BARNET.net>

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:56:15 +0100 (CET)
Vaclav Peroutka ####@####.#### wrote:

> - when I add some variable in CBLOCK and then in code i use it like
> "movlw VARIABLE" I would like to have some warning as well...
I'm not positive what you described makes sense. CBLOCK doesn't add
variables, it only defines constants that can be (and usually are) used
as the address of a register. Are you saying you want a warning in case
you do an indirect access (through INDF), or were you thinking you
would get an actual register value from "movlw VARIABLE"?

> BTW - is bug with Message [220] for EEPROM already removed in the
> version 0.13.5 for Win32 from 2007-11-11 in Sourceforge.net ?
I don't think so. I'm gearing up to release 0.13.6 "soon" because the
SDCC developers had asked about it, but I'm not sure how long it will
take me to get it taken care of.

David

Previous by date: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000 Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions, Ralph Corderoy
Next by date: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000 Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions, David
Previous in thread: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000 Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions, Ralph Corderoy
Next in thread: 21 Mar 2008 17:37:10 -0000 Re: [gnupic] Nice to have: GPASM extensions, David


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.