gnupic: [Err] Re: [gnupic] Gpsim stability problems
Subject:
[Err] Re: [gnupic] Gpsim stability problems
From:
####@####.####
Date:
29 Apr 2008 06:13:45 -0000
Message-Id:
Transmit Report:
####@####.#### ¸ÞÀÏ ¹ß¼ÛÀ» 1¹ø ½ÃµµÇßÁö¸¸ ½ÇÆÐÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù.
(½ÇÆÐ ÀÌÀ¯ : 550 No inbox for ####@####.####
<Âü°í> ½ÇÆÐ ÀÌÀ¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼³¸í
User unknown :¸ÞÀÏÀ» ¼ö½ÅÇÒ »ç¿ëÀÚ°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ½
Socket connect fail:¼ö½Å ¸ÞÀÏ ¼¹ö¿Í ¿¬°á ½ÇÆÐ
DATA write fail :¼ö½Å ¸ÞÀÏ ¼¹ö·Î ¸Þ¼¼Áö ¼Û½Å ½ÇÆÐ
DATA reponse fail :¼ö½Å ¸ÞÀÏ ¼¹ö·ÎºÎÅÍ ¸Þ¼¼Áö ¼ö½Å ½ÇÆÐ
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:52:46 +1000
"Phil" ####@####.#### wrote:
>
> I went to the GTK site to get the latest release but I have discovered that the
> bug is in GTK+ rather than GTK+ EXTRA. Have I got this correct, I think so?
No, the bug is in gtk+extra - it mismatches a g_ref operation with a
free, which breaks catastrophically if the object has multiple
references (or if the GTK build is using a different malloc, which can
happen on some systems). The fix is the replace the free with a g_unref.
I've attached the patch file, since finding it in Gentoo portage was
easier than finding the gtk+extra web site. Given that Gentoo still
have to patch it, I suspect the gtk+extra maintainers are not
maintaining it properly and still haven't got round to applying the
patch.
[Content type text/x-patch not shown. Download]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
