gnupic: Re: Enhanced PIC16 Architecture
Subject:
Fwd: Enhanced PIC16 Architecture
From:
"David Barnett" ####@####.####
Date:
20 Jun 2008 13:27:54 -0000
Message-Id: <4d52f78b0806200627p20bdf995h8d0514aae475cfc8@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:08 AM, ####@####.#### wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am an architect at Microchip Technology and we are enhancing the 14 bit
> PICmicro.
>
> ...
>
> I have attached 2 overview documents for the new system. I have updated
> GPASM and I would like to send a tgz of the system but the e-mail size limit
> was reached. Let me know where to send it.
>
The best thing to do would be to create a patch instead of a big tgz. If
you've still got the files in an SVN repository, you can run "svn diff >
p14e.patch" on the command line and send that file. If you could do that and
send it to the gputils patch
tracker<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=41924&atid=431667>,
that would be best. Otherwise, you can send it to me either at
####@####.#### or ####@####.#### and there shouldn't
be any size limits on my end (but then I'll create a diff and upload it to
the patch tracker just the same).
I'm right in the middle of some critical changes leading up to 0.14.0, so I
may not get to it right away, but I'll make sure the support gets included
in the next release, just over the horizon.
> I have sent this directly to the 4 of you because I do not have the
> bandwidth to answer questions on the whole mailing list.
>
James Bowman and Craig Franklin are probably not too interested in gputils
news these days. Scott Dattalo might be tracking our progress, but for now
I'm the main gputils contact. We also have a lot of active users involved on
the mailing list.
Hope that answers your questions.
David
