gnupic: Re: [gnupic] GPasm maint


Previous by date: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000 Re: [gnupic] GPasm maint, Rob Hamerling
Next by date: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000 GPasm include files, Rob Hamerling
Previous in thread: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000 Re: [gnupic] GPasm maint, Rob Hamerling
Next in thread: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000 Re: [gnupic] GPasm maint, Rob Hamerling

Subject: Re: [gnupic] GPasm maint
From: David ####@####.####
Date: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000
Message-Id: <20080705201903.6a11c6c5@DEEPTHOUGHT.BARNET.net>

On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:58:25 +0200
Rob Hamerling ####@####.#### wrote:

> 
> Hi David,
> 
> ...
> Is 'config.h' of real importance (in my case)? Reason to ask:
> - I didn't define HAVE_CONFIG_H and therefore the 'include config.h'
> is skipped by most modules, except libiberty/vsnprintf.c
> - But when I comment out the 'include config.h' in vsnprintf.c I don't
>    get any compiler error or warning
> So it seems to me superfluous.
It's filled with #defines to select different options at build time. I
attached the config.h from my system so you can see what I mean. I
think most of the places you need it have #ifdefs, so that you won't
get "undefined" errors, you'll just have strange settings.

David

[Content type text/x-chdr not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000 Re: [gnupic] GPasm maint, Rob Hamerling
Next by date: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000 GPasm include files, Rob Hamerling
Previous in thread: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000 Re: [gnupic] GPasm maint, Rob Hamerling
Next in thread: 6 Jul 2008 00:18:19 -0000 Re: [gnupic] GPasm maint, Rob Hamerling


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.