gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gputils development


Previous by date: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils development, Vaclav Peroutka
Next by date: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils development, Xiaofan Chen
Previous in thread: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils development, Vaclav Peroutka
Next in thread: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils development, Xiaofan Chen

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gputils development
From: "David Barnett" ####@####.####
Date: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000
Message-Id: <4d52f78b0811131215m2e69289fv29e686544399d4f@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Vaclav Peroutka ####@####.#### wrote:

> > gpsim is ok.
> Yes, ok. I don't use gpsim too much. Maybe somebody can clarify - can I
> simulate the code written in C-language compiled with SDCC ?

Last I heard, you can't step through C lines. That's why gpsim always prints
"FIXME: HLL files are not supported at the moment" on the terminal.

BTW Xiaofan, I think gputils could help with some problems that seem like
they're SDCC-only. For instance, a lot of people hesitate to use C because
of the code bloat, and SDCC doesn't do a ton of optimization compared to the
alternatives, but some link-time optimizations could really cut down on the
bloat.

David

Previous by date: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils development, Vaclav Peroutka
Next by date: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils development, Xiaofan Chen
Previous in thread: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils development, Vaclav Peroutka
Next in thread: 13 Nov 2008 20:15:27 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils development, Xiaofan Chen


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.