gnupic: Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues


Previous by date: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000 Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues, David Barnett
Next by date: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000 Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues, David Barnett
Previous in thread: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000 Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues, David Barnett
Next in thread: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000 Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues, David Barnett

Subject: Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues
From: Michael Ballbach ####@####.####
Date: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000
Message-Id: <20081130193131.GA31036@wayreth.rten.net>

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:35:34AM -0500, David Barnett wrote:
> These are great changes. I don't have any objections to listing the
> code_pack sections byte-by-byte if that works for everyone. I can't
> imagine it would cause any problems.

For comparison, it's what MPASM does. The only way we differ is they use
15 characters for this 'field' in the output, and we use only 10.

> Would I be right in assuming that the infinite loop bug is the same as
> our bug #1988473?(
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=431665&aid=1988473&group_id=41924
> )

Yes, definitely. I would have looked at this earlier had I known it was
an issue, I'm sorry to say that while I subscribe to the list I am not
very attentive when I am busy with other things. Do I need to sign-up in
there or something? I would do so if you wanted to assign bugs like that
to me in the future.

-- 
Michael Ballbach, N0ZTQ
####@####.#### -- PGP KeyID: 0xA05D5555
http://www.rten.net/

[Content type application/pgp-signature not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000 Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues, David Barnett
Next by date: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000 Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues, David Barnett
Previous in thread: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000 Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues, David Barnett
Next in thread: 30 Nov 2008 19:31:40 -0000 Re: [gnupic] code_pack issues, David Barnett


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.