gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gputils QA


Previous by date: 14 Mar 2009 16:31:18 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils-0.13.7 released, David Barnett
Next by date: 14 Mar 2009 16:31:18 -0000 Re: gputils-0.13.7 released, Taisuke Yamada
Previous in thread: 14 Mar 2009 16:31:18 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils QA, David Barnett
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [gnupic] gputils QA
From: Peter Keller ####@####.####
Date: 14 Mar 2009 16:31:18 -0000
Message-Id: <20090314163013.GA7138@cs.wisc.edu>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 07:35:19PM -0400, David Barnett wrote:
> It sounds pretty helter-skelter, but it's worked well for us.

Well, given that this command with the latest valgrind on the latest
trunk sources

valgrind --trace-children=yes --leak-check=full sh -x ./test all > & test.log

produced *no* memory errors in any of the tools except for some memory leaks,
which aren't that important in transient processes, I'd say the QA system you
have works exceedingly well. :)

-pete

Previous by date: 14 Mar 2009 16:31:18 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils-0.13.7 released, David Barnett
Next by date: 14 Mar 2009 16:31:18 -0000 Re: gputils-0.13.7 released, Taisuke Yamada
Previous in thread: 14 Mar 2009 16:31:18 -0000 Re: [gnupic] gputils QA, David Barnett
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.