gnupic: Re: [gnupic] gpdasm 0.13.6 alpha question
Subject:
Re: [gnupic] gpdasm 0.13.6 alpha question
From:
Peter Keller ####@####.####
Date:
18 Mar 2009 00:51:45 -0000
Message-Id: <20090318005034.GA19663@cs.wisc.edu>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 03:44:20PM +0000, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> > We have some real issues with our testing framework (which is just a
> > few shell scripts), so do whatever you'd like to the test system as
> > long as we're still testing everything our current tests do.
>
> Just want to mention http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/manual/ here in
> case it's useful.
So what things do you *need* the test framework to do that it doesn't do
now? After reading the wiki page, the only thing I see so far is that you
could catagorize failures in such a manner as to easily decide on whether
or not you should halt a release depending upon what broke. Anything else
you'd specifically like? Html/human output of results? That sort of thing?
I personally have no objections to using dejagnu (though, is tcl/tk going
to be around a while? It seems to be falling out of favor with the hacker
community.), does it support a particularly nice feature that you folks
want incorporated?
Also, what should I check out to do my work? The trunk? Any words of
wisdom before I start tinkering with stuff?
Thank you.
-pete
