gnupic: Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike


Previous by date: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000 Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike, Xiaofan Chen
Next by date: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000 Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike, Holger Rapp
Previous in thread: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000 Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike, Xiaofan Chen
Next in thread: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000 Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike, Holger Rapp

Subject: Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike
From: Tamas Rudnai ####@####.####
Date: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000
Message-Id: <492f1420906070305x3887424cy780dbced35c0010@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Peter Keller ####@####.#### wrote:

> What would the challenges be in writing a completely standalone
> preprocessor which just emits the processed assembly to be then fed
> into gpasm?
>

Why would write the #define / #include style preprocessor at all? This
should be done by existing tools like the cpp instead of reinventing the
wheel. The "other preprocessor" used by MPASM which is involved by the
equ/macro style could be written as a separated preprocessor which would
make the remaining compiler fairly trivial in my opinion.

Is there a linker implemented in this SPASM with the MPASM style linker
scripts?

Tamas
-- 
http://www.mcuhobby.com

Previous by date: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000 Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike, Xiaofan Chen
Next by date: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000 Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike, Holger Rapp
Previous in thread: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000 Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike, Xiaofan Chen
Next in thread: 7 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0000 Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike, Holger Rapp


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.