gnupic: Relocatable support (Was: Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike)
Subject:
Relocatable support (Was: Re: [gnupic] SPASM - a MPASM behave alike)
From:
Holger Rapp ####@####.####
Date:
7 Jun 2009 20:58:16 -0000
Message-Id: <BE23EEF9-0B82-4454-AE00-191B81EE5CA9@gmx.net>
Hi,
> I actually think relocatable code support would be the best feature
> to add
> to SPASM next to make it's widely adopted.
Well, I cannot promise anything and help would greatly be appreciated;
but I am kind of interested in the mechanics of relocatable code.
Could you provide some insight into new style coff (-C option to
gpasm) and old style coff? is it necessary to support both?
I found this document on the homepage
http://gputils.sourceforge.net/51288a.pdf
But the objects gpasm creates start with 0x1240 instead of the
documented 0x1234. The test files in the testsuite also start with
0x1234.
Cheers,
Holger
