gnupic: gpsim: TMR0 has 3 nibbles?


Previous by date: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000 gpasm-0.9.12, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000 gpasm.pdf, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000 Re: gpsim: TMR0 has 3 nibbles?, Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000 Re: gpsim: TMR0 has 3 nibbles?, Craig Franklin

Subject: Re: gpsim: TMR0 has 3 nibbles?
From: John Sutton ####@####.####
Date: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000
Message-Id: <01090813211000.26574@diva.localdomain>

On Sat, 08 Sep 2001, Craig Franklin wrote:
> I really didn't intend on mail bombing the list with this discussion. 
> Oh well.

Sorry, I didn't mean to cause any offence.
 
> Are you refering to the spec file located in gpsim-0.20.1-0.src.rpm?  I
> don't believe this spec is being used any more.

Yes, that was the one.
 
> Currently, binaries are being generated by the makefile and template in
> the rpm subdirectory of the source.
> 
> Although the new method does use an alternate build area, it does not
> prevent multiple rpms of different versions from being generated.  That
> is not to say that the new method doesn't violate some other "rule", but
> it does work. 
> 
> Please take a look at the new method, I would like to hear any
> suggestions you have. 

I'll certainly try the new one once I've gotten the beast working again!  (I've
been installing directly from the tar file of late.)

Sorry again.

PS While I have your attention!  Does the lastest gpasm support "label fixups"
in macros?

> John Sutton wrote:
> > 
> > When you build a binary rpm from a source rpm your filesystem (outside of the
> > build area) should not get touched.  If this rule is not observed, it is
> > impossible to build a new version of a package without at the same time
> > trashing your current version ;-(
> > 
> > On Fri, 07 Sep 2001, Craig Franklin wrote:
> > > I am curious what you meant by the PPS.  Could you please elaborate?
> > >
> > > John Sutton wrote:
> > > > PPS I'll write you a "RedHat-compliant" gpsim.spec!  Your current version is a
> > > > "riot of omission" if it was intended for use on RH?  I don't know how other
> > > > vendors (Suse, etc) do their thing.
> > > >
> > > > ***************************************************
> > > > John Sutton
> > > > SCL Computer Services
> > > > URL http://www.scl.co.uk/
> > > > Tel. +44 (0) 1239 711 888
> > > > ***************************************************
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> > --
> > 
> > ***************************************************
> > John Sutton
> > SCL Computer Services
> > URL http://www.scl.co.uk/
> > Tel. +44 (0) 1239 711 888
> > ***************************************************
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
-- 

***************************************************
John Sutton
SCL Computer Services
URL http://www.scl.co.uk/
Tel. +44 (0) 1239 711 888
***************************************************

Previous by date: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000 gpasm-0.9.12, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000 gpasm.pdf, Craig Franklin
Previous in thread: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000 Re: gpsim: TMR0 has 3 nibbles?, Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 8 Sep 2001 12:29:15 -0000 Re: gpsim: TMR0 has 3 nibbles?, Craig Franklin


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.