gnupic: SDCC status


Previous by date: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000 Re: SDCC status, Michael Shiloh
Next by date: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000 Re: SDCC status, Erasmo Brenes
Previous in thread: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000 Re: SDCC status, Michael Shiloh
Next in thread: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000 Re: SDCC status, Erasmo Brenes

Subject: Re: SDCC status
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110171023280.13738-100000@ruckus.brouhaha.com>

On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Erasmo Brenes wrote:

> I have ported/fixed the small-c compiler that was placed on the
> gnupic website (by John Fatava?). The version I have working generates
> assembly code for MPASM or gpasm. Also, I've modified some of the
> code generation (slight improvement) and debugged a few of the
> bugs inherent on the compiler. I have used this compiler on a couple
> of small to medium projects and so far works ok. If anyone is
> interested,
> or if Scott wants to put this version on the gnupic website, please
> let me know.

Sure, send it over. I'll be glad to put it up on the gnupic webpage.

I'm really interested to see how you did this. When I looked at it a year
or so ago I almost had to take anti-nausea medication. I reckon though if
you don't care about speed or processor utilization, then small-c is just
fine!

Scott


Previous by date: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000 Re: SDCC status, Michael Shiloh
Next by date: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000 Re: SDCC status, Erasmo Brenes
Previous in thread: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000 Re: SDCC status, Michael Shiloh
Next in thread: 17 Oct 2001 17:28:14 -0000 Re: SDCC status, Erasmo Brenes


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.