gnupic: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?


Previous by date: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Scott Dattalo

Subject: Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?
From: Craig Franklin ####@####.####
Date: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000
Message-Id: <3BE48275.B7C14AD0@home.com>

Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> 
> I suggested the file's inclusion, not because its an MCU, but because
> its a Microchip device and all of the other headers are for Microchip
> devices. So in that sense it seemed to "fit in". After looking at it
> from a different direction I can see how it doesn't. I won't complain if
> it gets rejected, it was just a suggestion.

It is a good suggestion.  We just need to work out the details.

I will put together a plan and standards for an "extras" gpasm package. 
I will request files from the community for the package.  If the
response is "good", I will make a release.

Scott, does this work for you?

other gpasm users:  It would be nice to get a "ya I got some files for
you" response from this message.

> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####

Previous by date: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 3 Nov 2001 22:47:13 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Scott Dattalo


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.