gnupic: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?


Previous by date: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Niklas Wennerstrand
Previous in thread: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Niklas Wennerstrand

Subject: Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111031449580.10753-100000@ruckus.brouhaha.com>

On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Craig Franklin wrote:

> Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> >
> > I suggested the file's inclusion, not because its an MCU, but because
> > its a Microchip device and all of the other headers are for Microchip
> > devices. So in that sense it seemed to "fit in". After looking at it
> > from a different direction I can see how it doesn't. I won't complain if
> > it gets rejected, it was just a suggestion.
>
> It is a good suggestion.  We just need to work out the details.
>
> I will put together a plan and standards for an "extras" gpasm package.
> I will request files from the community for the package.  If the
> response is "good", I will make a release.
>
> Scott, does this work for you?

Yep.


Previous by date: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Craig Franklin
Next by date: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Niklas Wennerstrand
Previous in thread: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Craig Franklin
Next in thread: 3 Nov 2001 22:50:39 -0000 Re: mcp2510.inc in gpasm headers?, Niklas Wennerstrand


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.