nanogui: QT Port?


Previous by date: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000 Re: Do Opera & GTK+/GDK be supported?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Roberto Alsina
Previous in thread: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Jean-Eric Cuendet
Next in thread: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Roberto Alsina

Subject: Re: QT Port?
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000
Message-Id: <062701bfa62b$19989da0$15320cd0@gregh>

: QT is COMPLETELY open-source (the X11 version). Event if Troll wants to,
: they CAN'T retain rights on it. QT will never be closed-sourced because they
: simply can't under the license they choose (QPL). That's why redhat
: introduced KDE in their distibution. (No closed-source product in RedHat)

My issue isn't with QT, I'm aware that the toolkit sometimes costs
money.  However, QT/Embedded, which is their new framebuffer
version that runs on Linux, isn't even open source.

I am interested in getting QT running on Microwindows, so there
will be a free version that will permit QT programs to run on framebuffer.


Regards,

Greg



Previous by date: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000 Re: Do Opera & GTK+/GDK be supported?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Roberto Alsina
Previous in thread: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Jean-Eric Cuendet
Next in thread: 14 Apr 2000 16:14:39 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Roberto Alsina


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.