nanogui: QT Port?


Previous by date: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Erwin Rol
Previous in thread: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Erwin Rol

Subject: Re: QT Port?
From: Roberto Alsina ####@####.####
Date: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10004141340450.3432-100000@ultra208.unl.edu.ar>

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Erwin Rol wrote:

> Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > Guys,
> > > how about helping Greg with the GTK/GDK Port ?
> > > Somehow, my self, I feel better with an open source stuff
> > > then with a product
> > > owned by a Company.
> > > Who guarantee, when some embedded product (using Qt) have
> > > success on the
> > > market, then you have to pay extra for Qt?
> > >
> > 
> > My thouhgts are:
> > QT is COMPLETELY open-source (the X11 version). Event if Troll wants to,
> No it isn't , you are not allowed to backport it to Windows! what does
> this mean for a Win32 like API ????


Methinks you have read too much propaganda lately.
Go read the QPL, and then come back.

Hint: the QPL doesn't mention platforms anywhere.


 `9_ 9  )   `-. (    ).`-._.`)  ####@####.####
 (_Y_.)' ._   ) `._`.  " -.-'   Centro de Telematica
  _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.'           Universidad Nacional del Litoral
(l)-'' ((i).' ((!.'             Santa Fe - Argentina
                                KDE Developer (MFCH)
The stone age didn't end for a lack of stone" Firoz Rasul


Previous by date: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Erwin Rol
Previous in thread: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 14 Apr 2000 16:57:07 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Erwin Rol


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.