nanogui: Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines)
Subject:
Re: Bitblt proposal (was: Re: bogl routines)
From:
Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date:
20 May 1999 09:09:17 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9905200950090.379-100000@hyperspace>
On 17 May 1999, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Ben Pfaff ####@####.#### writes:
> [...bitblt proposal...]
>
> Should I take this as initial assent to my proposal? If so, then I'll
> get started on it sometime this week, probably implementing vga16 and
> cfb8 as a test case.
Did you get anywhere with this Ben?
How close are the variable bit width drivers to being usable (I'm assuming
they're the bogl-tcfb and bogl-pcfb drivers)? Also, am I right in thinking
that the VGA16 will still require a separate driver due to it's non-linear
architecture (which would also seem to be why GGI won't work on top of
it)?
--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------
