nanogui: a question about flnx on framebuffer


Previous by date: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000 Re: displaying console and "tux" on framebuffer, Alex Holden
Next by date: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000 Re: A question about windows' movement, Marc R. Wetzel
Previous in thread: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, Alex Pavloff
Next in thread: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, Alex Pavloff

Subject: RE: Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10104301846590.1311-100000@hyperspace.linuxhacker.org>

On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alex Pavloff wrote:
> While we're talking about mice, I've got a question.  We're using and are
> still planning to use, mainly for cost issues, a grid touch screen.  It sits
> on a quarter-VGA panel, and is quite adequate for the purposes that we use,
> which is basically to punch buttons on the screen.  What's going to be the
> best way to get this going with Microwindows?  

That depends on what the interface to it looks like. Is it a serial port
device or do you need to drive the hardware directly? If the former, does
it emulate some other common mouse device or use its own protocol?

-- 
------- Alex Holden -------
http://www.linuxhacker.org/
 http://www.robogeeks.org/


Previous by date: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000 Re: displaying console and "tux" on framebuffer, Alex Holden
Next by date: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000 Re: A question about windows' movement, Marc R. Wetzel
Previous in thread: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, Alex Pavloff
Next in thread: 30 Apr 2001 17:50:35 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, Alex Pavloff


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.