nanogui: NanoX on Agenda


Previous by date: 24 May 2001 14:10:27 -0000 Re: linux2.4 and framebuffer, Jordan Crouse
Next by date: 24 May 2001 14:10:27 -0000 Re: More...Porting to a custom video device, Simon Wood
Previous in thread: 24 May 2001 14:10:27 -0000 NanoX on Agenda, Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [nanogui] NanoX on Agenda
From: Jordan Crouse ####@####.####
Date: 24 May 2001 14:10:27 -0000
Message-Id: <01052408092002.22437@cosmic>

> The Agenda people have swapped X and Y in the input data. So that in
> mou_tp.c we need to swap p.x and p.y. I don't know how nano-X should
> handle that, maybe a special compile option ?
>

Sure..  If portrait mode is turned on and compiled in, we should 
automatically swap the axis accordingly.

 Are there benchmarks that I could run ? Or ways to assess memory
> consumption accurately (free seems very unreliable and ps makes it
> impossible to understand anything with shared libraries.) ?

Benchmarks for these sorts of things are shaky at best.  Try going through 
the /proc directory and read some of the memory information (cpuinfo, 
meminfo, etc..) stored there.  Of all the places on the system, that will be 
your best bet for figuring out how your memory consumption is looking.  In 
fact, any utility you end up compiling and copying over will just read the 
/proc anyway.

Jordan

Previous by date: 24 May 2001 14:10:27 -0000 Re: linux2.4 and framebuffer, Jordan Crouse
Next by date: 24 May 2001 14:10:27 -0000 Re: More...Porting to a custom video device, Simon Wood
Previous in thread: 24 May 2001 14:10:27 -0000 NanoX on Agenda, Gaillard Pierre-Olivier
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.