nanogui: Cleaning up the source trees


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Alex Holden
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: Cleaning up the source trees
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" ####@####.####
Date: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000
Message-Id: <008101bf0a76$f0aef600$b8119526@ltc.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
To: Vidar Hokstad ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Cleaning up the source trees


> Greg changed all of the files to be 8.3
> so that he can build it on DOS, but I think the directory tree I came up
> with achieves that using more understandable names (eg.
> server/screen/bogl.c instead of server/drivers/scr_bogl.c).

If there is a valid need for 8.3, then why not support it?

> I split off
> bogl, so instead of having a modified version of bogl included with the
> Nano-X tree, it can simply use the standard, unmodified bogl library
> (available elsewhere on LinuxHacker).

I like that idea.  However... aren't we going to have to modify bogl
eventually anyway?

Regards,
Brad


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Alex Holden
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 12:41:12 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.