nanogui: Cleaning up the source trees
Subject:
Re: Cleaning up the source trees
From:
Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date:
29 Sep 1999 18:14:37 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9909291856190.387-100000@hyperspace>
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> I prefer it also, but is it feasable? The other thing is, how likely is it
> that Ben will progress Bogl faster than Nano-X and/or Microwindows will
> progress Bogl? His comments on his web page lead me to believe that Bogl is
> a pretty low priority for him, at least currently.
I don't know. It still makes more sense to only have one Bogl
tree/distribution though (with a CONFIG_NANO_X option if necessary),
especially since not everybody will use the Bogl driver. You wouldn't
suggest including a modified GGI with the Nano-X distribution once the
GGI driver goes in...
--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------
