nanogui: Cleaning up the source trees
Subject:
Re: Cleaning up the source trees
From:
"Bradley D. LaRonde" ####@####.####
Date:
29 Sep 1999 18:18:50 -0000
Message-Id: <008f01bf0aa6$1d3848a0$b8119526@ltc.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
To: Bradley D. LaRonde ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: Cleaning up the source trees
> On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> > I prefer it also, but is it feasable? The other thing is, how likely is
it
> > that Ben will progress Bogl faster than Nano-X and/or Microwindows will
> > progress Bogl? His comments on his web page lead me to believe that
Bogl is
> > a pretty low priority for him, at least currently.
>
> I don't know. It still makes more sense to only have one Bogl
> tree/distribution though (with a CONFIG_NANO_X option if necessary),
> especially since not everybody will use the Bogl driver. You wouldn't
> suggest including a modified GGI with the Nano-X distribution once the
> GGI driver goes in...
Hrm... GGI... do I need that? I forget now what it is even. :-)
Regards,
Brad
