nanogui: linux framebuffer vs. linear video driver ???


Previous by date: 30 Aug 2004 14:56:30 +0100 Porting nano-X to uClinux on M68VZ328, "=?GB2312?Q?=D0=EC=CF=B0=CE=C4?="
Next by date: 30 Aug 2004 14:56:30 +0100 Another thread question, Andy Jorde
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 30 Aug 2004 14:56:30 +0100 Re: linux framebuffer vs. linear video driver ???, Greg Haerr

Subject: linux framebuffer vs. linear video driver ???
From: Steven Scholz ####@####.####
Date: 30 Aug 2004 14:56:30 +0100
Message-Id: <41333209.5030809@imc-berlin.de>

Hi there,

Has onyone expierence in programming microwindows video driver?

I wonder if it would be faster to use a dedicated linear video driver 
instead of the linux framebuffer device (/dev/fb0).

Are there other reasons not to use the linux framebuffer?

I noticed the file drivers/fblin4sa1100.c. Is it use in addition to /dev/fb0 
or instead of?

Thanks a million!

-- 
Steven Scholz

Previous by date: 30 Aug 2004 14:56:30 +0100 Porting nano-X to uClinux on M68VZ328, "=?GB2312?Q?=D0=EC=CF=B0=CE=C4?="
Next by date: 30 Aug 2004 14:56:30 +0100 Another thread question, Andy Jorde
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 30 Aug 2004 14:56:30 +0100 Re: linux framebuffer vs. linear video driver ???, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.