nanogui: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP
From:
Jachym Holecek ####@####.####
Date:
7 Jun 2005 23:20:16 +0100
Message-Id: <20050607222004.GA6297@merlot.ics.muni.cz>
Hello,
> I don't like #ifdefs either, generally, and have tried to keep many out
> of Microwindows. However, in the case of the included drivers,
> its VERY HANDY for testing to allow all drivers to be linked in
> and switch the kernel fb modes, and have mwin handle it.
I'm not sure I understand here. What I propose is not to necessarily
remove per-driver defines, but rather to have the driver table
generated at compile time depending of what drivers did the user
actually include in the build.
> Requiring sed and awk utilities to build is not a good idea, IMO.
Good point -- we can use a tiny C program for that.
> However, adding options in the config file to allow inclusion of only
> certain drivers for size reasons is probably a good idea.
I've been planning to take a closer look at Nano-X in a week or so,
hopefully I'll post an actual patch to discuss.
Regards,
-- Jachym Holecek
