nanogui: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans


Previous by date: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Bradley D. LaRonde

Subject: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000
Message-Id: <006801bf1453$8f065060$14320cd0@censoft.com>

: Here's my interpretation: dual means both licenses are simultaneously
: availabe, while convertible means that you have to give up MPL to get GPL,
: and then can't go back.
: 
: I think if we freely want to mix with GPL code, our stuff has to have a
: persistent GPL license along side of the MPL license.
: 
: That way, we can mix in GPL-only code freely, and others can use our dual
: code (but not the mixin GPL-only parts) in other MPL or even proprietary
: projects.

This means that we have to be careful about allowing GPL only code in the
project, doesn't it?  As then a portion of the project becomes GPL only.
I appears that we can only allow code in the project that will be dual MPL/GPL.

Greg


Previous by date: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 12 Oct 1999 01:54:43 -0000 Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans, Bradley D. LaRonde


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.