plustek: Antwort: more on umax3400/3420


Previous by date: 14 Feb 2002 10:16:16 -0000 more on umax3400/3420, Allan N. Hessenflow
Next by date: 14 Feb 2002 10:16:16 -0000 Re: Problem with Optic Pro 12000T, Jaeger, Gerhard
Previous in thread:
Next in thread:

Subject: Antwort: more on umax3400/3420
From: ####@####.####
Date: 14 Feb 2002 10:16:16 -0000
Message-Id: <0057440005717546000002L462*@MHS>

Hi

these are good news, you can send the patches (as diff) to:
####@####.####
I will integrate the stuff to the current sources.

>I switched to version 0_41_4 and made the changes to it for Umax
3400/3420
>support, and it almost works.  Low resolution scans look fine; higher
>resolution scans are washed out.  Probably the integration times are
wrong,
>but before I look into that I thought I'd ask in case someone here has
seen
>the same thing and can tell me exactly what to look for.
>
>Also, the lamp is now being left on when the device is closed; I haven't
>looked for that yet either.

This behaviour can be controlled by the option lampOff in the
plustek.conf file: a 0 means leave lamp untouched upon leaving the
driver and a 1 means switch off the lamp...

>
>Once I get those straightend out, is there a preferred method to submit
>patches?
>
>allan

BTW: What are the differences between the 3400 and the 3420?

Cheers
   Gerhard


*****************************************
--> Please reply to: ####@####.#### <--
*****************************************

Previous by date: 14 Feb 2002 10:16:16 -0000 more on umax3400/3420, Allan N. Hessenflow
Next by date: 14 Feb 2002 10:16:16 -0000 Re: Problem with Optic Pro 12000T, Jaeger, Gerhard
Previous in thread:
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.