plustek: epson 1250 perfection usb scanner


Previous by date: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000 epson 1250 perfection usb scanner, Tom Hull
Next by date: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000 Re: OpticWorks 2000?, Jaeger, Gerhard
Previous in thread: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000 epson 1250 perfection usb scanner, Tom Hull
Next in thread: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000 Re: epson 1250 perfection usb scanner, Tom Hull

Subject: Re: epson 1250 perfection usb scanner
From: "Jaeger, Gerhard" ####@####.####
Date: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000
Message-Id: <200205240621.IAA28419@kah.ulm.sysgo.de>

Hi Tom,

On Freitag, 24. Mai 2002 06:34, Tom Hull wrote:
[SNIP]
> OK, I'm real confused here. I just bought a Epson 1250 Perfection USB
> Scanner as a gift for my nephew, naively figuring that since my Epson
> 1650 scanner works both USB and SCSI, the USB-only should work. Yeah.

The 1650 and the 1250 are qutie different!!!!

>
> This is how I got this far:
>
>   Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (Seawolf)
>   Kernel 2.4.2-2 on an i686

Here's the problem!!! The 2.4.2 does not support the automatic detection
of scanners by a backend... see below!

>
> /etc/modules.conf had this line:
>
>   alias usb-controller usb-uhci
>
> I did rpm -e on the old sane modules, then downloaded and built:
>
>   sane-backends-1.0.7
>   sane-frontends-1.0.7
>   xsane-0.86

Okay so far!

>
> For the plustek module, I downloaded plustek-module-0_42_9.tar.gz, then:
>
>   cd sane-backends-1.0.7/backend
>   tar zxvf ../../plustek-module-0_42_9.tar.gz
>   cd plustek_driver
>   make all
>   make install

NO NEED TO DO THIS FOR USB DEVICES!!!! This driver is only good
for the Plustek parallel port scanner.

[SNIPSNAP]
>   modprobe scanner vendor=0x4b8 product=0x10f

For Kernel 2.4.2, this one is correct!

>
> I did both (in that order); lsmod now says (among other things):
>
>   scanner   6240 0 (unused)
>   usb-uhci 20720 0 (unused)
>   usbcore  49664 1 [scanner usb-uhci]
>
> I also don't understand how the plustek module gets used for an Epson
> scanner (although in this case it very probably isn't).

As said before, the Plustek module is not needed, only the Plustek-backend,
as this controls LM983x based scanners. The LM983x is an ASIC, developed
by National Semiconductors, to build cheap scanners. And such a beast is
inside the 1250.

>
> I scanned back through the last 3-4 months of mail archive; evidently
> some people have gotten the thing working (somewhat), so I must be doing
> something wrong. What?
>
> Also, is there any reason not to think that it will eventually work
> pretty well? (While I can still afford to take it back.)

Well, the main problem currently is the calibration. But do a test on your
own before bringing it back...

You only have to alter the plustek.conf file in your sane.d directory to
enable the EPSON, the following entry should be enough to enable it:

[usb] 0x04B8 0x010F
device /dev/usbscanner


Hope this helps
  Gerhard

 -------------------------
|gerhard AT gjaeger DOT de|
 -------------------------


Previous by date: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000 epson 1250 perfection usb scanner, Tom Hull
Next by date: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000 Re: OpticWorks 2000?, Jaeger, Gerhard
Previous in thread: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000 epson 1250 perfection usb scanner, Tom Hull
Next in thread: 24 May 2002 06:28:01 -0000 Re: epson 1250 perfection usb scanner, Tom Hull


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.