plustek: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice.


Previous by date: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000 Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice., Gene Heskett
Next by date: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000 Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice., Hein-Jan Leliveld
Previous in thread: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000 Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice., Gene Heskett
Next in thread: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000 Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice., Hein-Jan Leliveld

Subject: Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice.
From: Gerhard Jaeger ####@####.####
Date: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000
Message-Id: <200210241155.09300.gerhard@gjaeger.de>

On Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002 11:31, Gene Heskett wrote:
[SNIP]
> From the clues here, where most have reported it went dead in the
> middle of a scan, no light, no motor, no nothing and the carriage
> is left sitting in mid-scan, darned near the only thing this old
> troubleshooter with 50 years of experience in electronics can
> believe is that the PSU died.  

But if the PSU dies, this can be checked easily! Or is that PSU a built-in 
one? All my Merlin scanners (Plustek, HP, Musktek) used have an extra
PSU outside the device. So it's possible to replace it quickly.

> I do know that my scanner makes a lot more noise in some modes using
> the plustek backend compared to the noise it makes when using the
> epson GT-7200 backend from iscan, which BTW I've yet to be able to
> fully compile, it always barfs on the iscan gui here.  Anyway, the
> increased noise level would tend to make me think the motor is
> being driven both harder, and possibly a bit out of phase.  

This noise can be corrected by finding out the correct values experimental.
The tables inside plustek-devs.c define different ranges for clock-divider,
PWM and PWM-duty:

The EPSON currently used the following table:

{ MODEL_NOPLUSTEK_1200, 1, 48, 6,
    /* Motor settings (PWM and PWM_Duty) */
    /* <=75dpi    <=100dpi    <=150dpi   <=200dpi  <=300dpi  */
    {{ 1, 48 }, { 1, 48 }, { 1, 48 }, { 1, 48 }, { 1, 48 },
    /* <=400dpi   <=600dpi   <=800dpi   <=1200dpi  <=2400dpi */
    {2, 48 }, { 8, 48 }, { 2, 48 }, { 1, 48 }, { 1, 48 }},
    /* Color mode MCLK settings */
    { 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 4.0, 4.0, 4.0, 5.5, 5.5 },
    /* Gray mode MCLK settings */
     { 5.0, 5.0, 5.0, 5.0, 5.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0 }
},

It think at least the 1200 dpi values may need to be corrected,
but as long as I don't have any test device, I need some feedback...
Maybe we can realize the plan to meet Reinhard in November to
torture his 1250 ;-)

Cheers
  Gerhard


Previous by date: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000 Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice., Gene Heskett
Next by date: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000 Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice., Hein-Jan Leliveld
Previous in thread: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000 Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice., Gene Heskett
Next in thread: 24 Oct 2002 09:56:31 -0000 Re: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice., Hein-Jan Leliveld


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.